[Merged by Bors] - chore: bump to nightly-2023-01-06 #1397
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
semorrison
added
the
awaiting-review
This was referenced Jan 7, 2023
semorrison
added
ready-to-merge
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2023
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded:
|
bors
bot
changed the title
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2023
One earlier failure was extensively discussed: - https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Performance.20issue.20with.20.60CompleteBooleanAlgebra.60/near/319019205 - https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/type.20class.20inference.20looping and is fixed as of leanprover/lean4@70a6c06, in mathlib as of the bump #1335. Another failure posted to Zulip and the Lean 4 repo - https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/type.20class.20inference.20failure.20in.20pi.20type - leanprover/lean4#2011 and is fixed as of leanprover/lean4@fedf235, in mathlib as of the bump #1397. There is one more mysterious `apply` failure, now worked around; we should track this down someday. - [x] depends on: #1397 Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2023
- [x] depends on: #1397 Co-authored-by: Heather Macbeth <25316162+hrmacbeth@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net> Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: ChrisHughes24 <chrishughes24@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
jcommelin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2023
One earlier failure was extensively discussed: - https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Performance.20issue.20with.20.60CompleteBooleanAlgebra.60/near/319019205 - https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/type.20class.20inference.20looping and is fixed as of leanprover/lean4@70a6c06, in mathlib as of the bump #1335. Another failure posted to Zulip and the Lean 4 repo - https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/type.20class.20inference.20failure.20in.20pi.20type - leanprover/lean4#2011 and is fixed as of leanprover/lean4@fedf235, in mathlib as of the bump #1397. There is one more mysterious `apply` failure, now worked around; we should track this down someday. - [x] depends on: #1397 Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.