New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(CategoryTheory/Monoidal): add whiskering operators #6307
Open
yuma-mizuno
wants to merge
79
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
ymizuno-monoidal-whiskering
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added
the
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
label
Aug 2, 2023
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
removed
the
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
label
Aug 3, 2023
semorrison
reviewed
Aug 5, 2023
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
yuma-mizuno
added
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
and removed
WIP
Work in progress
labels
Aug 5, 2023
yuma-mizuno
changed the title
refactor(CategoryTheory/Monoidal): whiskerings as fundamental
refactor(CategoryTheory/Monoidal): add whiskering operators
Aug 5, 2023
semorrison
reviewed
Aug 6, 2023
semorrison
reviewed
Aug 6, 2023
semorrison
reviewed
Aug 6, 2023
semorrison
reviewed
Aug 6, 2023
semorrison
reviewed
Aug 6, 2023
Comment on lines
548
to
554
calc | ||
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ | ||
X₁ ◁ ((β_ X₂ Y₁).hom ▷ (Y₂ ⊗ Z₁) ≫ (Y₁ ⊗ X₂) ◁ (β_ Y₂ Z₁).hom) ▷ Z₂ ⊗≫ | ||
X₁ ◁ Y₁ ◁ (β_ X₂ Z₁).hom ▷ Y₂ ▷ Z₂ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := ?eq1 | ||
_ = _ := ?eq2 | ||
case eq1 => coherence | ||
case eq2 => rw [← whisker_exchange]; coherence |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My preference is not to use this ?eqn
style, but to write the proofs inline in the calc
block, at least when the proofs are as short as these ones.
I'm happy to use this technique for multiline proofs needed in a calc block, however.
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added
the
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
label
Mar 4, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
removed
the
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
label
Mar 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added
the
blocked-by-other-PR
This PR depends on another PR which is still in the queue.
label
Mar 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
removed
the
blocked-by-other-PR
This PR depends on another PR which is still in the queue.
label
Mar 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added
the
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
label
Mar 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
removed
the
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
label
Mar 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added
the
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
label
Mar 14, 2024
dagurtomas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
dagurtomas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
fpvandoorn
added
the
awaiting-author
A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes
label
Apr 5, 2024
callesonne
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting-author
A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes
merge-conflict
The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging.
t-category-theory
Category theory
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We introduce whiskering operators. This allows us to introduce a simp-normal form for morphisms in monoidal categories. Rewriting into simp-normal forms is especially useful when combined with the coherence tactic.
tensorLeft
by using whiskering #10898𝟙 X ⊗ f
withX ◁ f
#10912𝟙 X ⊗ f
withX ◁ f
#11223