Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: do not pretty print theorems with generalized field notation #3750

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2024
Merged

fix: do not pretty print theorems with generalized field notation #3750

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2024

Conversation

kmill
Copy link
Collaborator

@kmill kmill commented Mar 23, 2024

For example, pretty print as Nat.add_comm m n rather than as m.add_comm n.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Mar 23, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Mathlib CI status (docs):

  • ❗ Std/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-mathlib branch. Try git rebase 2ed777b2b4fb90856ce74ed8ec1460e650062946 --onto 6c8976abbea74e6abb059de6267a0804cf14f614. (2024-03-23 09:10:00)

@kmill kmill added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 23, 2024
Merged via the queue into leanprover:master with commit 925a6be Mar 23, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@kmill @leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot