Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build an executable for the ncurses interface #154

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vindarel
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

I suggest to distribute Lem executables in addition of the Roswell installation process. This is the way I found and I'd like your feedback. Indeed, downloading an executable is easier and lighter than installing roswell and its dependencies, I'm sure it will make more people try Lem, and it's maybe easier to develop with (I don't know how you develop with Roswell).

A CI system can easily build a new binary at every new tag push.

I have many edits like so

+(asdf:defsystem "lem-c-mode" 

because I need this to C-c C-k in Slime and for the make target, but there may be another way if that bothers you.

I didn't try for Electron yet.

Regards

@snmsts
Copy link
Member

snmsts commented Jan 17, 2018

I hate this.

@snmsts snmsts closed this Jan 17, 2018
@tani
Copy link

tani commented Jan 17, 2018

You can make a new package ‘ lem-installer ‘ instead of this request. Could you like it?
I guess it is good way to distribute it for brew or pkgsrc. I’m looking forward your work! Thanks.

@vindarel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@snmsts I've seen you more helpful. Seriously, do you dislike the ability to ship binaries or the form of this PR ? (which is ok, I asked for feedback)

Building binaries is a great feature of CL. If it is in opposition with the project, I don't get it.

@snmsts
Copy link
Member

snmsts commented Jan 17, 2018

i'm a bit irritated to prepared something without Roswell
. Sorry about the attitude. But still,I don’t like how it achieved.
I’ll prepare binary in other way.Would you mind just keep it close and open a issue?

@vindarel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

vindarel commented Jan 17, 2018

Ok, thanks for the clarification.

But still,I don’t like how it achieved.
I’ll prepare binary in other way.

+1 !

The issue: #155

ps: about lem-installer: I don't see what it would do.

@tani
Copy link

tani commented Jan 17, 2018

@vindarel For example, In Ubuntu has so many packages named *-installer. They have no contents and just have installer scripts. I misunderstood that it makes such a thing with this request, and misunderstood that this is your opinion .

I see that you want an only feedback. Don’t mind.

@vindarel vindarel deleted the build-executable branch June 28, 2023 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants