Skip to content

letsencrypt/boulder

main
Switch branches/tags
Code

Latest commit

The metadata values were planned to be used for scanning Redis in
ocsp-updater. Since we won't do that, remove it. Happily, this also
allows us to get rid of shortIssuerId.

Removing the issuer check in rocsp_sa.go uncovered a "boxed nil" problem:
SA was doing a nil check against an interface field that in practice was
never nil (because it was promoted from a concrete type at construction
time). So we would always hit the ROCSP path. But one of the first steps
in that path was looking up an issuer ID. Since `test/config` never
had the issuers set, we would look up the issuer ID, not find it, and
return an error before we attempted to call storeResponse. To fix this,
I made `NewSQLStorageAuthority` take a concrete `*rocsp.WritingClient`
instead of an interface, and check for nil before assigning it to an
internal interface field.

Built on top of #6201.
18b5194

Git stats

Files

Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
Type
Name
Latest commit message
Commit time
Jan 16, 2017

Boulder - An ACME CA

Build Status

This is an implementation of an ACME-based CA. The ACME protocol allows the CA to automatically verify that an applicant for a certificate actually controls an identifier, and allows domain holders to issue and revoke certificates for their domains. Boulder is the software that runs Let's Encrypt.

Contents

Overview

Boulder is divided into the following main components:

  1. Web Front Ends (one per API version)
  2. Registration Authority
  3. Validation Authority
  4. Certificate Authority
  5. Storage Authority
  6. Publisher
  7. OCSP Updater
  8. OCSP Responder

This component model lets us separate the function of the CA by security context. The Web Front End, Validation Authority, OCSP Responder and Publisher need access to the Internet, which puts them at greater risk of compromise. The Registration Authority can live without Internet connectivity, but still needs to talk to the Web Front End and Validation Authority. The Certificate Authority need only receive instructions from the Registration Authority. All components talk to the SA for storage, so most lines indicating SA RPCs are not shown here.

                             +--------- OCSP Updater
                             |               |
                             v               |
                            CA -> Publisher  |
                             ^               |
                             |               v
       Subscriber -> WFE --> RA --> SA --> MariaDB
                             |               ^
Subscriber server <- VA <----+               |
                                             |
          Browser ------------------>  OCSP Responder

Internally, the logic of the system is based around five types of objects: accounts, authorizations, challenges, orders (for ACME v2) and certificates, mapping directly to the resources of the same name in ACME.

We run two Web Front Ends, one for each ACME API version. Only the front end components differentiate between API version. Requests from ACME clients result in new objects and changes to objects. The Storage Authority maintains persistent copies of the current set of objects.

Objects are also passed from one component to another on change events. For example, when a client provides a successful response to a validation challenge, it results in a change to the corresponding validation object. The Validation Authority forwards the new validation object to the Storage Authority for storage, and to the Registration Authority for any updates to a related Authorization object.

Boulder uses gRPC for inter-component communication. For components that you want to be remote, it is necessary to instantiate a "client" and "server" for that component. The client implements the component's Go interface, while the server has the actual logic for the component. A high level overview for this communication model can be found in the gRPC documentation.

The full details of how the various ACME operations happen in Boulder are laid out in DESIGN.md.

Setting up Boulder

Development

Boulder has a Dockerfile and uses Docker Compose to make it easy to install and set up all its dependencies. This is how the maintainers work on Boulder, and is our main recommended way to run it for development/experimentation. It is not suitable for use as a production environment.

While we aim to make Boulder easy to setup ACME client developers may find Pebble, a miniature version of Boulder, to be better suited for continuous integration and quick experimentation.

We recommend setting git's fsckObjects setting before getting a copy of Boulder to have better integrity guarantees for updates.

Clone the boulder repository:

git clone https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/
cd boulder

Additionally, make sure you have Docker Engine 1.13.0+ and Docker Compose 1.10.0+ installed. If you do not, you can follow Docker's installation instructions.

We recommend having at least 2GB of RAM available on your Docker host. In practice using less RAM may result in the MariaDB container failing in non-obvious ways.

To start Boulder in a Docker container, run:

docker-compose up

To run our standard battery of tests (lints, unit, integration):

docker-compose run --use-aliases boulder ./test.sh

To run all unit tests:

docker-compose run --use-aliases boulder ./test.sh --unit

To run specific unit tests (example is of the ./va directory):

docker-compose run --use-aliases boulder ./test.sh --unit --filter=./va

To run all integration tests:

docker-compose run --use-aliases boulder ./test.sh --integration

To run specific integration tests (example runs TestAkamaiPurgerDrainQueueFails and TestWFECORS):

docker-compose run --use-aliases boulder ./test.sh --filter TestAkamaiPurgerDrainQueueFails/TestWFECORS

To get a list of available integration tests:

docker-compose run --use-aliases boulder ./test.sh --list-integration-tests

The configuration in docker-compose.yml mounts your boulder checkout at /boulder so you can edit code on your host and it will be immediately reflected inside the Docker containers run with docker-compose.

If you have problems with Docker, you may want to try removing all containers and volumes.

By default, Boulder uses a fake DNS resolver that resolves all hostnames to 127.0.0.1. This is suitable for running integration tests inside the Docker container. If you want Boulder to be able to communicate with a client running on your host instead, you should find your host's Docker IP with:

ifconfig docker0 | grep "inet addr:" | cut -d: -f2 | awk '{ print $1}'

And edit docker-compose.yml to change the FAKE_DNS environment variable to match. This will cause Boulder's stubbed-out DNS resolver (sd-test-srv) to respond to all A queries with the address in FAKE_DNS.

Alternatively, you can override the docker-compose.yml default with an environmental variable using -e (replace 172.17.0.1 with the host IPv4 address found in the command above)

docker-compose run --use-aliases -e FAKE_DNS=172.17.0.1 --service-ports boulder ./start.py

Running tests without the ./test.sh wrapper:

Run all unit tests

docker-compose run --use-aliases boulder go test -p 1 ./...

Run unit tests for a specific directory:

docker-compose run --use-aliases boulder go test <DIRECTORY>

Run integration tests (omit --filter <REGEX> to run all):

docker-compose run --use-aliases boulder python3 test/integration-test.py --chisel --gotest --filter <REGEX>

Boulder's default VA configuration (test/config/va.json) is configured to connect to port 5002 to validate HTTP-01 challenges and port 5001 to validate TLS-ALPN-01 challenges. If you want to solve challenges with a client running on your host you should make sure it uses these ports to respond to validation requests, or update the VA configuration's portConfig to use ports 80 and 443 to match how the VA operates in production and staging environments. If you use a host-based firewall (e.g. ufw or iptables) make sure you allow connections from the Docker instance to your host on the required ports.

Working with Certbot

Check out the Certbot client from https://github.com/certbot/certbot and follow their setup instructions. Once you've got the client set up, you'll probably want to run it against your local Boulder. There are a number of command line flags that are necessary to run the client against a local Boulder, and without root access. The simplest way to run the client locally is to use a convenient alias for certbot (certbot_test) with a custom SERVER environment variable:

SERVER=http://localhost:4001/directory certbot_test certonly --standalone -d test.example.com

Your local Boulder instance uses a fake DNS resolver that returns 127.0.0.1 for any query, so you can use any value for the -d flag. To return an answer other than 127.0.0.1 change the Boulder FAKE_DNS environment variable to another IP address.

Working with another ACME Client

Once you have followed the Boulder development environment instructions and have started the containers you will find the ACME endpoints exposed to your host at the following URLs:

  • ACME v2, HTTP: http://localhost:4001/directory
  • ACME v2, HTTPS: https://localhost:4431/directory

To access the HTTPS versions of the endpoints you will need to configure your ACME client software to use a CA truststore that contains the test/wfe-tls/minica.pem CA certificate. See test/PKI.md for more information.

Your local Boulder instance uses a fake DNS resolver that returns 127.0.0.1 for any query, allowing you to issue certificates for any domain as if it resolved to your localhost. To return an answer other than 127.0.0.1 change the Boulder FAKE_DNS environment variable to another IP address.

Most often you will want to configure FAKE_DNS to point to your host machine where you run an ACME client. Remember to also configure the ACME client to use ports 5002 and 5001 instead of 80 and 443 for HTTP-01 and TLS-ALPN-01 challenge servers (or customize the Boulder VA configuration to match your port choices).

Production

Boulder is custom built for Let's Encrypt and is intended only to support the Web PKI and the CA/Browser forum's baseline requirements. In our experience often Boulder is not the right fit for organizations that are evaluating it for production usage. In most cases a centrally managed PKI that doesn't require domain-authorization with ACME is a better choice. For this environment we recommend evaluating cfssl or a project other than Boulder.

We offer a brief deployment and implementation guide that describes some of the required work and security considerations involved in using Boulder in a production environment. As-is the docker based Boulder development environment is not suitable for production usage. It uses private key material that is publicly available, exposes debug ports and is brittle to component failure.

While we are supportive of other organization's deploying Boulder in a production setting we prioritize support and development work that favors Let's Encrypt's mission. This means we may not be able to provide timely support or accept pull-requests that deviate significantly from our first line goals. If you've thoroughly evaluated the alternatives and Boulder is definitely the best fit we're happy to answer questions to the best of our ability.

Contributing

Please take a look at CONTRIBUTING.md for our guidelines on submitting patches, code review process, code of conduct, and various other tips related to working on the codebase.

Code of Conduct

The code of conduct for everyone participating in this community in any capacity is available for reference on the community forum.

License

This project is licensed under the Mozilla Public License 2.0, the full text of which can be found in the LICENSE.txt file.