Adding orthographic profile #4
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tresoldi
requested review from
xrotwang,
SimonGreenhill,
LinguList and
chrzyki
LinguList
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2020
|
Is this list identical with the list of symbol equivalents we have for BIPA in CLTS? if not, I'd encourage you to add the symbols to our ASJP transcriptionsystem, so we cover the full range of ASJP there... |
|
If I remember (I did this months ago) the BIPA in CLTS is a subset of the one I am pushing, some combinations of symbols + diacritics were missing. I'll add an issue there. |
|
awesome, thanks @tresoldi. |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a profile, as discussed in #2 (comment)
It is of course impossible to revert the "compression" performed by ASJP code, so that we end up with a very broad phonemic transcription, where the grapheme indicates a sound-space not only wider than expected, but also potentially mixing two or more phonemes in the same language. No way around that, unless one redoes ASJP from scratch. Note also that, as in the ASJP definition, some forms are actually reduced, not including morphological/inflected material that is actually necessary for a true form.
The profile includes a handful of corrections for cases that were against the formal definition of ASJP, and which I looked up either in the original or in other sources. Those are all single-form entries, with starting with
^and ending with$.