You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi lfz,
I have one question about the luna data used during training.
There're 1187 and 684 nodules with diameter greater than 3mm and 6mm respectively, but it seems only 478 nodules are labeled as positive during training. What about the remaining 684-478=106 nodules? Is there any other screening criteria than diameter?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi lfz,
I have one question about the luna data used during training.
There're 1187 and 684 nodules with diameter greater than 3mm and 6mm respectively, but it seems only 478 nodules are labeled as positive during training. What about the remaining 684-478=106 nodules? Is there any other screening criteria than diameter?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: