Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supporting other languages? #169

Open
Malorra opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Supporting other languages? #169

Malorra opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Malorra
Copy link
Contributor

Malorra commented May 8, 2024

Is there a possibility that we can support other languages?

Reasons for supporting other languages:

  • Making the opening explorer more accessible for people who do not speak English.
  • creating a possibility for people to search for the opening in their native language, talking about openings to other people in the native language.
  • it looks better when there is only one language on a page

This is probably a big amount of work, especially with hundreds of lines of Openings, but some basic translations can probably be done for popular openings.

@niklasf
Copy link
Member

niklasf commented May 25, 2024

Do you think it would be feasible to split a name like

Hungarian Opening: Reversed Brooklyn Defense, Brooklyn Benko Gambit

into components like

Hungarian Opening
Reversed Brooklyn Defense
Brooklyn Benko Gambit

to avoid duplicated work, or will some languages naturally have special names for specific lines?

Is there any hope generalizing <name> Opening, <name> Gambit, etc.?

@Malorra
Copy link
Contributor Author

Malorra commented May 26, 2024

I think that splitting the opening names into the suggested components is a good idea. But I don't know if this generalization is possible in every language in every case. Sometimes the "Formation" could be called a "Variation" in a specific language. Also, some languages have different grammar. For example, in German the "King's Gambit" is written in one word as "Königsgambit". But perhaps the larger parts could be generalized, and exceptions could be handled separately.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants