Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Sats Names to make lighting address easier to recognize, easier to read, easier to remember #1084

Closed
OliverThompsonOT opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@OliverThompsonOT
Copy link

If you don't know what is Sats Names, you can read this doc:
https://docs.sats.id/sats-names/about

Sats Names is a standard for writing names to Bitcoin using ordinals. The goal is to build a name ecosystem for Bitcoin, that is built by Bitcoiners, and developed entirely on Bitcoin.

it can make lighting address easier to recognize, easier to read, easier to remember, and most important, it's decentralized.

  • All namestate lives on Bitcoin
  • The protocol will remain credibly neutral
  • Names are inscribed as ordinals, and the only fees involved are paid to miners on the Bitcoin network.

FAQs: https://docs.sats.id/sats-names/faqs

Why we need this?

  • easier to recognize, easier to read, easier to remember, and most important, it's decentralized

I'm not an engineer, but perhaps you can discuss with the author of Sats how to implement this. https://twitter.com/satsnames

My idea is as follows:

for instance, an address that owns bitcoin.sats could mint an inscription declaring that the Lightning Network address/invoice corresponding to that bitcoin.sats is ****.
Afterwards, when transferring to this bitcoin.sats via the Lightning Network, one could send to the Lightning Network receiving address corresponding to this bitcoin.sats

@saubyk
Copy link

saubyk commented May 30, 2023

Unclear on what this has to do with the bolt specification? Seems like an issue you should raise with the team which created the lightning address standard.

@OliverThompsonOT
Copy link
Author

Unclear on what this has to do with the bolt specification? Seems like an issue you should raise with the team who created the lightning address standard.

how to find them?

@OliverThompsonOT
Copy link
Author

Unclear on what this has to do with the bolt specification? Seems like an issue you should raise with the team who created the lightning address standard.

I am unsure of whom I should seek.

As for the Bitcoin and Lightning addresses, I propose that we devise an address format that is not only easier to recognize, read, and remember, but also importantly, decentralized.

@dpad85
Copy link

dpad85 commented May 30, 2023

I am unsure of whom I should seek.

See https://github.com/lnurl/luds/blob/luds/16.md - as well as https://github.com/andrerfneves/lightning-address.

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

This isn't an actionable proposal. If you want to contribute a new way of describing payment info, it should come in the form of a PR here or to the bLIPs repo (if applicable).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants