Add User to Instance global fields #1190
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Exposes the Username for an instance as a possible field in `list --format`. This is added as a global field for now because the username is not yet customizable. If or when that becomes an option, this field can remain the same but be moved to an instance field. Signed-off-by: Scott Walkinshaw <scott.walkinshaw@gmail.com>
swalkinshaw
force-pushed
the
add-user-to-list-field
branch
from
b2ba9c5
to
4a6451f
Compare
|
Any reason not to just use |
|
Hadn't occurred to me 😅 That would work for my use case now but I do think this field would make more sense if #1015 ends up being implemented. It's a little weird now since every instance would just list the same user. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Exposes the Username for an instance as a possible field in
list --format.This is added as a global field for now because the username is not yet customizable. If or when that becomes an option, this field can remain the same but be moved to an instance field.
Related to #1015