-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[IR] Add zext nneg flag #67982
[IR] Add zext nneg flag #67982
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ enum Kind { | |
kw_nsw, | ||
kw_exact, | ||
kw_inbounds, | ||
kw_nneg, | ||
kw_inrange, | ||
kw_addrspace, | ||
kw_section, | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ bool Operator::hasPoisonGeneratingFlags() const { | |
// Note: inrange exists on constexpr only | ||
return GEP->isInBounds() || GEP->getInRangeIndex() != std::nullopt; | ||
} | ||
case Instruction::ZExt: | ||
if (auto *NNI = dyn_cast<PossiblyNonNegInst>(this)) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why do we need a dyn_cast instead of a cast like the other cases? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is in case it's a constant expression. I haven't completely finished the zext expr removal yet. |
||
return NNI->hasNonNeg(); | ||
return false; | ||
default: | ||
if (const auto *FP = dyn_cast<FPMathOperator>(this)) | ||
return FP->hasNoNaNs() || FP->hasNoInfs(); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The description of
nneg
is very minimal, vs the more detailed description in the RFC and PR. Maybe add to "Overview" something like "Thenneg
(non-negative) flag, if present, specifies that the operand is non-negative. This property may be used by optimization passes to later convert thezext
to a semantically equivalentsext
."There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done! (I dropped the "semantically equivalent" bit because it's a refinement, not an equivalence.)