-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[llvm-dwarfdump] pretty-print DW_AT_call_origin reference #71693
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo Author: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams (OCHyams) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71693.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDie.cpp b/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDie.cpp
index fcedef8db82185c..0f01933002c06db 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDie.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDie.cpp
@@ -190,7 +190,8 @@ static void dumpAttribute(raw_ostream &OS, const DWARFDie &Die,
// We have dumped the attribute raw value. For some attributes
// having both the raw value and the pretty-printed value is
// interesting. These attributes are handled below.
- if (Attr == DW_AT_specification || Attr == DW_AT_abstract_origin) {
+ if (Attr == DW_AT_specification || Attr == DW_AT_abstract_origin ||
+ Attr == DW_AT_call_origin) {
if (const char *Name =
Die.getAttributeValueAsReferencedDie(FormValue).getName(
DINameKind::LinkageName))
diff --git a/llvm/test/tools/llvm-dwarfdump/X86/prettyprint_call_site.yaml b/llvm/test/tools/llvm-dwarfdump/X86/prettyprint_call_site.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..2e44fcbcb131318
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/tools/llvm-dwarfdump/X86/prettyprint_call_site.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+# RUN: yaml2obj %s | llvm-dwarfdump - | FileCheck %s
+
+## Check the name (preferring linkage name) of the DW_AT_call_origin DIE
+## reference is printed after the address.
+
+# CHECK: DW_TAG_call_site
+# CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_call_origin (0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} "_Z2f2v")
+
+# CHECK: DW_TAG_call_site
+# CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_call_origin (0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} "f1")
+
+--- !ELF
+FileHeader:
+ Class: ELFCLASS64
+ Data: ELFDATA2LSB
+ Type: ET_EXEC
+ Machine: EM_X86_64
+DWARF:
+ debug_str:
+ - "_Z2f2v"
+ - "f2"
+ - "f1"
+
+ debug_abbrev:
+ - Table:
+ - Code: 0x0000000000000001
+ Tag: DW_TAG_compile_unit
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_yes
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_low_pc
+ Form: DW_FORM_addr
+ - Code: 0x0000000000000002
+ Tag: DW_TAG_subprogram
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_yes
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_name
+ Form: DW_FORM_strp
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_low_pc
+ Form: DW_FORM_addr
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_high_pc
+ Form: DW_FORM_addr
+ - Code: 0x0000000000000003
+ Tag: DW_TAG_call_site
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_no
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_call_origin
+ Form: DW_FORM_ref4
+ - Code: 0x0000000000000004
+ Tag: DW_TAG_subprogram
+ Children: DW_CHILDREN_no
+ Attributes:
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_linkage_name
+ Form: DW_FORM_strp
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_name
+ Form: DW_FORM_strp
+ - Attribute: DW_AT_declaration
+ Form: DW_FORM_flag_present
+ debug_info:
+ - Length: 0x3b
+ Version: 5
+ UnitType: 0x01 # DW_TU_compile
+ AbbrOffset: 0x0000000000000000
+ AddrSize: 8
+ Entries:
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000001 # start compile unit
+ Values: #
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000000 #
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000002 ## start f1
+ Values: ##
+ - Value: 0x000000000000000a ##
+ - Value: 0x0000000000001000 ##
+ - Value: 0x0000000000002000 ##
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000003 ### call site
+ Values: ###
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000035 ### (f2)
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000003 ### call site
+ Values: ###
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000015 ### (f1)
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000000 ## end f1
+ Values: [] #
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000004 ## f2
+ Values: ##
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000000 ##
+ - Value: 0x0000000000000007 ##
+ - AbbrCode: 0x00000000 # end compile unit
+ Values: []
+...
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great to me, thanks for improving llvm-dwarfdump
output! 😄
If you search the DWARF spec for "a reference", it looks like there are various other attributes that could also be given the same treatment as well... No need to do that in this PR though, just passing it along as a potential further improvement.
I was inspired by your recent change!
Yeah agreed. FWIW I chose this one as I recently spent a decent amount of time looking at call site info. Thanks for the review. I'll land this tomorrow to avoid knocking out bots before I sign off. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
I had a look around and couldn't find some existing code that already tests for whole DWARF attribute classes (like some kind of isReference
function) - but maybe it's hiding somewhere, or would be nice to write one eventually.
Commit fbc6520 Buildbot example: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/196/builds/39626
No description provided.