Skip to content

Conversation

runlevel5
Copy link

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 5076ea4 on joneslee85:patch-2 into b3c6d41 on lotus:master.

@jodosha
Copy link
Member

jodosha commented Nov 15, 2014

@JONESLEE85 Why do you want to remove some rubies? I understand the need to speedup builds, but this picture lets us to know in advance if some regression in a specific version will break Lotus.

@jodosha jodosha closed this Nov 15, 2014
@jodosha jodosha self-assigned this Nov 15, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants