Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements to the man page #13

Open
snim2 opened this issue Jun 5, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Improvements to the man page #13

snim2 opened this issue Jun 5, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@snim2
Copy link
Collaborator

snim2 commented Jun 5, 2015

  1. Add in more examples
  2. Explain CI levels better. Explain 2/3/5 sigma. Give an opinion as to best practice.
@snim2 snim2 self-assigned this Jun 5, 2015
@zbentley
Copy link
Contributor

zbentley commented Jun 3, 2018

This would be helpful for myself and my colleagues as well. Additionally, it would also be helpful for commandline options to have clearly documented default values.

@Lewiscowles1986
Copy link
Contributor

As an addendum to this, can I ask if the following can be explained or fixed if it is indeed a typo?

the mean is reported at a 95% confidence level (-c 99).

Surely -c 95 would give 95% confidence level? or you'd need -c 100 as well as -n 100 to have even the slimmest semblance of confidence in n% range?

@ltratt
Copy link
Owner

ltratt commented Oct 3, 2021

The confidence interval code is, as far as I can remember (and @snim2 might know more!) slightly unfinished.

Lewiscowles1986 added a commit to Lewiscowles1986/multitime that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2021
According to ltratt#13 the confidence score may have work to go.
At the moment, the difference between 95 and 99 is confusing.
For-now fix: remove the documentation of a confusing thing.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants