Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds conformsToProtocol forwarding to MPAppDelegateProxy #144

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 6, 2022

Conversation

cbaltzer
Copy link
Contributor

@cbaltzer cbaltzer commented Mar 25, 2022

Summary

Adds an implementation of conformsToProtocol: to MPAppDelegateProxy that bubbles up protocol implementations from the base AppDelegate. Issue is described in #143.

Had to add an extra singleton in order to get the original app delegate types. If anyone can think of a better way, input is extremely welcome.

Testing Plan

Manually smoke tested in our setup, and unit tested. Should be low-to-no impact for other integrations, but unknown.

Master Issue

Implementation as described in #143

Copy link
Contributor

@BrandonStalnaker BrandonStalnaker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@BrandonStalnaker BrandonStalnaker merged commit 16466ee into mParticle:main Apr 6, 2022
mparticle-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
# [8.8.0](v8.7.0...v8.8.0) (2022-05-17)

### Bug Fixes

* Fix Dereferenced Garbage Pointer ([#148](#148)) ([d2c58e1](d2c58e1))
* property memory annotations ([#146](#146)) ([c95ddf6](c95ddf6))
* update active kits header ([#147](#147)) ([d196723](d196723))

### Features

* add conformsToProtocol forwarding to MPAppDelegateProxy ([#144](#144)) ([40e517a](40e517a))
* add support for client side rules ([#151](#151)) ([6a93096](6a93096))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants