You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now every Space is treated as equivalent and only once a basis has been set (with some labels and ordering of states) one can distinguish between different kinds of degrees of freedom such as oscillators (->Fock space), spins (-> angular momentum space, with some J,M=-J,...J) and generalized N-level systems.
We should either allow annotating LocalSpace objects with further data or introduce subclasses for the above cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this still true? I think this may have been fixed by making the Hilbert spaces immutable. If this is still an issue, could you add a (failing) test to illustrate the expected behavior?
Right now every Space is treated as equivalent and only once a basis has been set (with some labels and ordering of states) one can distinguish between different kinds of degrees of freedom such as oscillators (->Fock space), spins (-> angular momentum space, with some J,M=-J,...J) and generalized N-level systems.
We should either allow annotating LocalSpace objects with further data or introduce subclasses for the above cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: