Implement the Security framework?

[grahamc]

Hi,

Taking a brief look at this, it looks really nice to expose the libraries so directly. It looks like the Security frameworks have not been included, but I also haven't seen any mention about why in any issue. Is this a task that is not yet done, but also maybe not too hard? Or is this likely to be a very challenging task? I'm happy and able to help.

Thank you!

[madsmtm]

It hasn't been included because it needs types from CoreFoundation, and header-translator is not set up to handle that yet (since it's a challenging task, see #556 for some of it).

[madsmtm]

See the security-framework crate for manually written bindings

[madsmtm]

I've added a bit more information on how to interop with such crates in eb39164.

Interfacing with CoreFoundation-like frameworks is tracked in #556, so am going to close this.

[madsmtm]

Update: I've added support for CoreFoundation-like frameworks now, so I'll re-open this to track adding the Security framework specifically.

[madsmtm]

Aaaand I managed to get it compiling in 161404a, required a bit of work to get header-translator to handle unions correctly.

Will be released in the next version, which should be relatively soon.