New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PayPal Pro 2 Step Processing #9296
Comments
Hello @snoroozi , Thank you for bringing this to our attention. |
Any chance of a patch on this. Was planning to go to production in the next couple weeks. |
I have requested for a patch for 2.1.x versions but I cannot promise to deliver it before some specific deadline though. |
Ok. Thanks, where should I look for that when it is available? |
We have the ticket linked to this issue on github, and we will update it when the fix is ready. |
@snoroozi : We have applied the workaround patch. Copy this js in your theme: /Magento_Checkout/web/js/action/set-payment-information.js Find this code :
and replace with below ` return storage.post(
Hope this works for you. |
I have put the attached file (the real js version, not attached txt version) in /public_html/app/design/frontend/Infortis/base/Magento_Checkout/web/js/action I have refreshed cache, redeployed static files, and checked out on private firefox tab and see no difference. Please advise what I'm doing wrong here |
Hey @snoroozi , The file is correct. Before deploying static files. You should remove all the pub/static files and then you should run static file deployment. |
Hi, after this patch the loader just spins a really long time. Order is placed, but confirmation screen not reached. Processing also takes far too long, it will still seem something is wrong. |
Actually on further tries the order does not get placed. Loader just keeps spinning. Perhaps you can provide code again with correct formatting to ensure I have nothing input wrong. |
You can check and modified the timeout value which is currently for my site is 6000. You can update based on your site . I have attached the code of entire JS. |
I've got it working, but it still takes entirely too long for the actual transaction to process. Do you have any advice on this? |
@snoroozi : Am not facing that too much time. |
Will you please try at my store?
…On Thu, Apr 27, 2017, 2:08 AM vishwes_krish ***@***.***> wrote:
@snoroozi <https://github.com/snoroozi> : Am not facing that too much
time.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9296 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACQbJTn14NjW6dnpRrpIQh-EFiNimDN1ks5r0DDRgaJpZM4NAdHh>
.
|
We dont have any details ! @snoroozi |
m2staging.com
You can use fake cc number
5176994252614657
03/19
123
My time out setting is currently 12000
…On Thu, Apr 27, 2017, 9:17 AM vishwes_krish ***@***.***> wrote:
We dont have any details ! @snoroozi <https://github.com/snoroozi>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9296 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACQbJdsFLqOmcHb3NahBX3qbjiTtUjxmks5r0JV-gaJpZM4NAdHh>
.
|
I see you tested. What feedback do you have?
…On Thu, Apr 27, 2017, 9:24 AM Scott Noroozi ***@***.***> wrote:
m2staging.com
You can use fake cc number
5176994252614657
03/19
123
My time out setting is currently 12000
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017, 9:17 AM vishwes_krish ***@***.***>
wrote:
> We dont have any details ! @snoroozi <https://github.com/snoroozi>
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#9296 (comment)>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACQbJdsFLqOmcHb3NahBX3qbjiTtUjxmks5r0JV-gaJpZM4NAdHh>
> .
>
|
yes yours taking too much time to load! |
Can I see/test your site to see the difference?
…On Fri, Apr 28, 2017, 1:43 AM vishwes_krish ***@***.***> wrote:
yes yours taking too much time to load!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9296 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACQbJdXyN8nF-ZE_Iq2u71SmbId02TlOks5r0XyGgaJpZM4NAdHh>
.
|
@YPyltiai : Hello When we can get the resolution of this issue ? |
Hi @vishveskrish, We already have a fix for current develop branch. It should be delivered to the mainline soon. |
Hi @snoroozi Fix for MAGETWO-60589 is merged to develop branch, closing the issue. |
@alena-marchenko what is the best way to get this fix before release. Can you tell me specific files to pull? |
Hi @snoroozi, typically that internal ticket ID is included into the commit messages, so the best guess would be to look it up like the following: |
Hi @alena-marchenko, Could you please provide an answer to the following questions:
Background for my questions: To be honest, I don't see how is "merged to develop branch" an acceptable resolution to an acknowledged bug. Until the fix is officially released, a lot of the users are still struggling with it. Considering that the switch to 2.2 will probably be somewhat resource-heavy and very delayed, it would make sense to have an alternative suggested officially to users of 2.1.x which would help use these numerous fixes in a safe and robust way (of which there seems to be none, to the best of my knowledge). |
When pressing the pay button after entering a credit card number, ajax is fired then stops. Page reloads on desktop browser then fires ajax again and then payment success. This will leave user confused or prone to press pay now twice. I have a screen video.
Preconditions
Steps to reproduce
Expected result
Actual result
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: