Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed the wrong code style in return type declaration #29703

Conversation

andrewbess
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewbess andrewbess commented Aug 20, 2020

Description (*)

This pull request (PR) fixes the wrong code style of the return type declaration

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)

Resolved issues:

  1. resolves [Issue] Fixed the wrong code style in return type declaration #29712: Fixed the wrong code style in return type declaration

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Aug 20, 2020

Hi @andrewbess. Thank you for your contribution
Here is some useful tips how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:

  • @magento give me test instance - deploy test instance based on PR changes
  • @magento give me 2.4-develop instance - deploy vanilla Magento instance

❗ Automated tests can be triggered manually with an appropriate comment:

  • @magento run all tests - run or re-run all required tests against the PR changes
  • @magento run <test-build(s)> - run or re-run specific test build(s)
    For example: @magento run Unit Tests

<test-build(s)> is a comma-separated list of build names. Allowed build names are:

  1. Database Compare
  2. Functional Tests CE
  3. Functional Tests EE,
  4. Functional Tests B2B
  5. Integration Tests
  6. Magento Health Index
  7. Sample Data Tests CE
  8. Sample Data Tests EE
  9. Sample Data Tests B2B
  10. Static Tests
  11. Unit Tests
  12. WebAPI Tests

You can find more information about the builds here

ℹ️ Please run only needed test builds instead of all when developing. Please run all test builds before sending your PR for review.

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Guide documentation.

⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all Pull Requests must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.

🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.

📞 The triage of Pull Requests happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, please join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

🎥 You can find the recording of the previous Community Contributions Triage on the Magento Youtube Channel

✏️ Feel free to post questions/proposals/feedback related to the Community Contributions Triage process to the corresponding Slack Channel

@ghost ghost added this to Pending Review in Pull Requests Dashboard Aug 20, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added Component: Captcha Release Line: 2.4 Partner: Atwix Pull Request is created by partner Atwix partners-contribution Pull Request is created by Magento Partner labels Aug 20, 2020
@andrewbess andrewbess changed the title Fixed bad code style in return type declaration Fixed the wrong code style in return type declaration Aug 20, 2020
@andrewbess
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run all tests

@sidolov sidolov added Priority: P4 No current plan to fix. Fixing can be deferred as a logical part of more important work. Severity: S4 Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”. Auto-Tests: Not Required Changes in Pull Request does not require coverage by auto-tests labels Aug 20, 2020
@ghost ghost moved this from Pending Review to Ready for Testing in Pull Requests Dashboard Aug 20, 2020
@ghost ghost assigned sidolov Aug 20, 2020
@sidolov
Copy link
Contributor

sidolov commented Aug 20, 2020

QA not required.

@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sidolov, thank you for the review.
ENGCOM-8053 has been created to process this Pull Request

@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa self-assigned this Aug 21, 2020
@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa moved this from Ready for Testing to Testing in Progress in Pull Requests Dashboard Aug 21, 2020
@engcom-Alfa
Copy link
Contributor

QA not applicable

@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa moved this from Testing in Progress to Extended Testing (optional) in Pull Requests Dashboard Aug 21, 2020
@engcom-Charlie engcom-Charlie self-assigned this Aug 21, 2020
@engcom-Charlie
Copy link
Contributor

@magento create issue

@engcom-Charlie engcom-Charlie moved this from Extended Testing (optional) to Merge in Progress in Pull Requests Dashboard Aug 21, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team merged commit e9ac642 into magento:2.4-develop Aug 24, 2020
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Aug 24, 2020

Hi @andrewbess, thank you for your contribution!
Please, complete Contribution Survey, it will take less than a minute.
Your feedback will help us to improve contribution process.

@ghost ghost moved this from Merge in Progress to Recently Merged in Pull Requests Dashboard Aug 24, 2020
@andrewbess andrewbess deleted the small-fixes/module-captcha-fix-code-style branch October 28, 2020 09:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Auto-Tests: Not Required Changes in Pull Request does not require coverage by auto-tests Component: Captcha Partner: Atwix Pull Request is created by partner Atwix partners-contribution Pull Request is created by Magento Partner Priority: P4 No current plan to fix. Fixing can be deferred as a logical part of more important work. Progress: accept Release Line: 2.4 Severity: S4 Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.
Projects
Pull Requests Dashboard
  
Recently Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Issue] Fixed the wrong code style in return type declaration
5 participants