Replace YYYY in the copyright line by the current year

[amenk]

No description provided.

[vkorotun]

Hi @amenk ,
We are going to reject your PR.
We have a task in our backlog MAGETWO-60398 which covers your use case (replace static text year in the copyright with the dynamic current year).

We consider using slightly different approach to address this issue (mostly for the sake of consistency). We want to re-use Magento static content filter object, which is used for rendering email templates and CMS blocks/pages content. Also we need to find the way to cover all “displayable” fields, so they all being passed through the filter, since developers may want to add dynamic parts in all such fields. For this particular case, the format of placeholder, or more correctly to say, directive, will be something like this {{currentDate format=“Y”}}.

[amenk]

How can I check the status of MAGETWO-60398 ?

[amenk]

Hey, what is the status of MAGETWO-60398 ?

[amenk]

@vkorotun What is the Status of MAGETWO-60398

[amenk]

Happy new year bump

[DanielRuf]

These are internal non-public issues.

@sidolov can you request more information?

[amenk]

Happy new year ..

@sidolov any news about the internal issue?

[amenk]

Workaround:

n98-magerun2 config:store:get design/footer/copyright --magerun-script | sed s/2020/2021/ | n98-magerun2 script

[sidolov]

Hi @amenk , the internal issue still in the open state. We'll let you know once the state will be changed.

[amenk]

@sidolov What the status of this?

[schmengler]

I love Magento but 6 years to find a complex solution to a simple problem is so on brand, it hurts

[sidolov]

@amenk internal issue still in a backlog, I'll escalate it to the product owners to correctly prioritize and fix it. Thanks for the input!

[torhoehn]

Just merge this approach. 😀 It's still possible to refactor that later. 🙃

[kolaente]

I love Magento but 6 years to find a complex solution to a simple problem is so on brand, it hurts

[amenk]

Happy belated new year :-)

[ihor-sviziev]

@amenk, I really like this very simple solution and don’t think we need that more advanced one, at least for now.
Unfortunately, I can’t reopen this pull request for some reason.
Could you please try to reopen it or create a new one with the same changes?

[amenk]

#36754