Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Displaying spouses #40

Closed
HRN65 opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

Displaying spouses #40

HRN65 opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@HRN65
Copy link

HRN65 commented Aug 21, 2023

Could we please have spouses hidden by default? And maybe also the option to not display "Show more options"?
I guess because of pedegree collapse and lines crossing several times in my family tree, the descendants chart looks cluttered when spouses are not hidden.

2108231654

@magicsunday
Copy link
Owner

Uh, that looks very strange indeed. Would it be possible if you could please provide me with a GEDCOM example that recreates this tattered layout? Maybe that could be fixed somehow.

@hartenthaler
Copy link

For me, it works as a charm, besides one minor point: would it be possible to put the crossing lines into the background?
descendants-chart (2)

@HRN65
Copy link
Author

HRN65 commented Aug 22, 2023

Thank you for looking into this! I tested some gedcom files available online, and found this family tree of Charles II of Spain, known for pedegree collapse. The Uncorrected CoR (Coefficient of Relationship) between his parents is 37.01% trough 18 relationships.
Try displaying descendants of Maria Anna of Bavaria
https://paginas.fe.up.pt/~jlborges/visualgenealogy/charles_II_of_spain.ged

2208231624

magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
… calculation, which may otherwise lead to possible invalid results
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
… calculation, which may otherwise lead to possible invalid results
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
… calculation, which may otherwise lead to possible invalid results
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
@magicsunday
Copy link
Owner

Hi, I found some glitches I could fix. I think it looks fine now.

grafik

magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
… calculation, which may otherwise lead to possible invalid results
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
magicsunday added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
@magicsunday magicsunday added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 23, 2023
@magicsunday
Copy link
Owner

@HRN65
Copy link
Author

HRN65 commented Aug 23, 2023

Thank you, that was quick! The 1.5.1 works like a charm!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants