You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear sir
I am using VASP + Wannier90 + TB2J to calculate magnetic interactions, and I found that the WF centers obtained using the SCDM method are not ideal and not around the atoms. I would like to know if this is because the SCDM method cannot control the WF centers, or if there are other parameters that can control them?
Thank you very much for your attention and support.
Sincerely,
JiuYin Li
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are working on this with another wannier tool, but it is not in
production yet. Proper centering should indeed improve the applicability
of the heisenberg effective Hamiltonian.
Best
MV
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024, 05:00 Lijiuyin ***@***.***> wrote:
Dear sir
I am using VASP + Wannier90 + TB2J to calculate magnetic interactions, and
I found that the WF centers obtained using the SCDM method are not ideal
and not around the atoms. I would like to know if this is because the SCDM
method cannot control the WF centers, or if there are other parameters that
can control them?
Thank you very much for your attention and support.
Sincerely,
JiuYin Li
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#59>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABWOT373BUSLJ4JYW43NFSTZLSPTPAVCNFSM6AAAAABKT7WN4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGM4TSNRUGIYTAMA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
Dear sir
I am using VASP + Wannier90 + TB2J to calculate magnetic interactions, and I found that the WF centers obtained using the SCDM method are not ideal and not around the atoms. I would like to know if this is because the SCDM method cannot control the WF centers, or if there are other parameters that can control them?
Thank you very much for your attention and support.
Sincerely,
JiuYin Li
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: