Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: replace duplicated Iterable type with UniversalIterable #141

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lifeisegg123
Copy link
Contributor

I was wondering why you didn't use UniversalIterable and UniversalIterator.
If there is reason to avoid using it, it would be lovely to explain me why 🙏

@shine1594
Copy link
Collaborator

Of course, there are no technical problems 😄 However, I think it is better to use the built-in type as it is for users who read the document. I don't want them to spend time looking up what UniversialIterable and UniversialIterator are.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants