Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add predeqP #309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2020
Merged

add predeqP #309

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2020

Conversation

affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

as mentioned on Zulip, statement found in PR#282

@@ -265,6 +265,9 @@ rewrite propeqE; split => [->|[FG GF]]; [by split|].
by rewrite predeqE => t; split=> [/FG|/GF].
Qed.

Lemma predeqP T (A B : set T) : (A = B) <-> (A `<=>` B).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Lemma predeqP T (A B : set T) : (A = B) <-> (A `<=>` B).
Lemma seteqP T (A B : set T) : (A = B) <-> (A `<=>` B).

@CohenCyril CohenCyril merged commit f7a5a64 into master Dec 21, 2020
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist deleted the predeqP branch January 19, 2021 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants