-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Countable products of metrics is metrizable #763
Conversation
56d5533
to
705a06f
Compare
705a06f
to
13e937e
Compare
13e937e
to
8f6915f
Compare
Is there anything else required to merge this, or is this ready for an approval? |
e1b6056
to
e099078
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried to improve a bit the scripts. I noticed uses of projT1
/projT2
where proj1_sig
a.k.a. as sval
would have been in order (causing at least one useless manual conversion) but it appears that using sval
makes it for unfolded expressions. I think that the definition of sval
is at fault and PRed MathComp math-comp/math-comp#964 . We can maybe replace these expressions later.
e6c62b3
to
6ec0f09
Compare
* proving sups preserve countable ent * proof going through * unused proofs * linting * metric implies countable uniformity * fixing changelog * linting * metric for products * linting * fixing docs * use %:pos * fixing changelog * fix changelog * nitpicking --------- Co-authored-by: Reynald Affeldt <reynald.affeldt@aist.go.jp>
* proving sups preserve countable ent * proof going through * unused proofs * linting * metric implies countable uniformity * fixing changelog * linting * metric for products * linting * fixing docs * use %:pos * fixing changelog * fix changelog * nitpicking --------- Co-authored-by: Reynald Affeldt <reynald.affeldt@aist.go.jp>
Motivation for this change
Finally, we prove that countable products of metrics are metrizable! In particularly, the cantor set is metrizable. I have
countable_uniformity
. Several lemmas use it, so it made sense to factor into a nicer definition. Note that this property is equivalent to metrizability, so it has little purpose outside of this family of proofs.countable_uniformity
. The definition of sup entourages is kinda annoying, so the proof is on the large side. It's not a blocker, just an inconvenience.Things done/to do
CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md
(do not edit former entries, only append new ones, be careful:
merge and rebase have a tendency to mess up
CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md
)Automatic note to reviewers
Read this Checklist and put a milestone if possible.