-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
StateJsonEditor should ignore package.json #150
Comments
@shiena I think black listing style will be cost (excluding specific file, such as So I think white listing style would be better. How do you think about this idea? |
@mattak |
Thanks! I'll change it as soon as possible. |
StateJsonEditor should ignore package.json #150
I created new release 0.4.1 for fixing package.json bug!
Current Inspector of |
@mattak openupm requires the same git tag as the version in package.json. |
@shiena Thanks! I forgot to update UPM version. I think pushed git tag should not be overwritten. |
@mattak Thanks you. |
StateJsonEditor should ignore package.json because upm's package.json is displayed by a dedicated Inspector.
This can be avoided by ae28b2e in #142.
View the inspector of package.json before unidux installation
View the inspector of package.json after unidux installation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: