-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 345
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: sync layer cleaned up contracts #463
Conversation
l1-contracts/contracts/state-transition/chain-deps/facets/Mailbox.sol
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
d9b83c1
to
e44c682
Compare
/// @notice Mapping from chain id to encoding of the base token used for deposits / withdrawals | ||
mapping(uint256 chainId => bytes32 baseTokenAssetId) public baseTokenAssetId; | ||
|
||
ISTMDeploymentTracker public stmDeployer; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
interface vs storage variable name is confusing, shall it be the stmDeploymentTracker then?
///// Getters | ||
/// @notice To set stmDeploymetTracker, only Owner. Not done in initialize, as | ||
/// the order of deployment is Bridgehub, Shared bridge, and then we call this | ||
function setSTMDeployer(ISTMDeploymentTracker _stmDeployer) external onlyOwner { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we expect a case where this is called separately from setAddresses
?
fb06992
to
ad522d1
Compare
…contracts into kl/sync-layer-reorg
Changes to gas cost
🧾 Summary (100% most significant diffs)
Full diff report 👇
|
Co-authored-by: Stanislav Bezkorovainyi <stanislavbezkor@gmail.com>
Set of fixes from gateway
Coverage after merging kl/sync-layer-reorg into sync-layer-stable will be
Coverage Report |
What ❔
Why ❔
Checklist