Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.0.9 Making types now more dynamic #302

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 12, 2019
Merged

0.0.9 Making types now more dynamic #302

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 12, 2019

Conversation

MichaelS11
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 12, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #302 into master will decrease coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 91.26%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #302      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.97%   91.86%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        2144     2177      +33     
==========================================
+ Hits         1972     2000      +28     
- Misses        112      115       +3     
- Partials       60       62       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
vm/vmExpr.go 96.68% <100%> (-0.16%) ⬇️
vm/vm.go 86.14% <86.95%> (+1.23%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 60896df...6078401. Read the comment docs.

Added TypeKind and TypeStruct
Updated MakeExpr
Removed NewExpr, MakeChanExpr, and ArrayCount
Added tests to TestNew and TestMake
Removed TestMakeChan
@MichaelS11
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mattn Good to merge

@mattn mattn merged commit c573355 into mattn:master Feb 12, 2019
@mattn
Copy link
Owner

mattn commented Feb 12, 2019

Thank you

@MichaelS11 MichaelS11 deleted the types branch February 12, 2019 01:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants