You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This means that the first entry is "small IR". We don't want small IR as the LUX reading, we want "white" as the Lux reading.
And, in fact, this "lux sensor" is not a lux sensor, it is a W/m^2 sensor. Lux needs to be compensated for frequency. It's possible that the SI1133 does this, but it's not obvious from the datasheet. See http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae409.cfm for more info.
First change is to transmit element [1] rather than [0]. Second is to possibly linearize, and third is to possibly change to a proper Lux sensor .
In any case, it is a big error to transmit this with the same data format as Rohm light output, because the engineering units are not commensurate. See #39.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Catena-Sketches/catena4551_test01/catena4551_test01.ino
Line 492 in b67901b
This is set up here:
Catena-Sketches/catena4551_test01/catena4551_test01.ino
Lines 267 to 269 in b67901b
This means that the first entry is "small IR". We don't want small IR as the LUX reading, we want "white" as the Lux reading.
And, in fact, this "lux sensor" is not a lux sensor, it is a W/m^2 sensor. Lux needs to be compensated for frequency. It's possible that the SI1133 does this, but it's not obvious from the datasheet. See http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae409.cfm for more info.
First change is to transmit element
[1]
rather than[0]
. Second is to possibly linearize, and third is to possibly change to a proper Lux sensor .In any case, it is a big error to transmit this with the same data format as Rohm light output, because the engineering units are not commensurate. See #39.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: