Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect passing of MegaMek options from MekHQ #21

Closed
Dylan-M opened this issue Feb 24, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Incorrect passing of MegaMek options from MekHQ #21

Dylan-M opened this issue Feb 24, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Dylan-M
Copy link
Contributor

Dylan-M commented Feb 24, 2016

From @monbvol on February 23, 2016 2:58

Campaign started fine but a few fights back for some reason when starting a fight in an AtB campaign the tech level under allowed units and equipment has been getting set to standard instead of experimental in MegaMek despite the MekHQ campaign having the same option set to experimental.

mekhqlog.txt

gamelog.zip
Monbvol.zip

Tweek's Linemen.zip

Copied from original issue: MegaMek/megamek#37

@Dylan-M Dylan-M added the Bug label Feb 24, 2016
@Dylan-M
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dylan-M commented Feb 24, 2016

Is this a MegaMek option in MekHQ, or is it a Campaign Option? (I'm at work, so I can't just fire it up and look)

@Dylan-M
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dylan-M commented Feb 24, 2016

From @pheonixstorm on February 23, 2016 22:25

Megamek option in HQ. Happened to me today (maybe yesterday but didn't notice. Mine is from the latest code and not the current release.

@Dylan-M Dylan-M self-assigned this Feb 24, 2016
Dylan-M added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2016
recent code changes
+ Issue #21: Incorrect passing of MegaMek options from MekHQ
@Dylan-M
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dylan-M commented Feb 24, 2016

Fixed in ec84325.

@Dylan-M Dylan-M closed this as completed Feb 24, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant