Harmonization tools for multi-site neuroimaging analysis. Part of the work reported in our paper with data from the ISTAGING consoritum [1].
contact: raymond (dot) pomponio (at) outlook (dot) com
This package extends the functionality of the package developed by Nick Cullen [2],
neuroCombat
.
Cullen's package, neuroCombat
, allows the user to perform a
harmonization procedure using the ComBat [3] algorithm for correcting
multi-site data.
This package, neuroHarmonize
, provides similar functionality, with additional
features:
- Support for working with NIFTI images. Implemented with the
nibabel
package. - Separate train/test datasets.
- Specify covariates with generic nonlinear effects. Implemented using
Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) from the
statsmodels
package. - Skip the empirical Bayes (EB) step of ComBat, if desired.
Latest version: 2.2.x
(May 2022)
Requirements:
git >= 2.17.2
python >= 3.6.8
To make installation easier, neuroCombat is not a formal dependency for this package, but the source code is included to call neuroCombat functions.
Option 1: Install from PyPI (Stable Version)
>>> pip install neuroHarmonize
Option 2: Install from GitHub (Development Version)
>>> pip install git+https://github.com/rpomponio/neuroHarmonize
Please note: the ComBat [3] algorithm corrects for site effects but
intentionally preserves covariate effects. If you wish to remove covariate
effects as well you can use the argument return_s_data
.
You must provide a data matrix which is a numpy.array
containing the
features to be harmonized. For example, an array
of brain volumes:
array([[3138.0, 3164.2, ..., 206.4], [1708.4, 2351.2, ..., 364.0], ..., [1119.6, 1071.6, ..., 326.6]])
The dimensionality of this matrix must be: N_samples x N_features
You must also provide a covariate matrix which is a pandas.DataFrame
containing all covariates to control for during harmonization. All covariates
must be encoded numerically (you must handle categorical covariates in a
pre-processing step, see pandas.get_dummies
). The DataFrame
must
also contain a single column called "SITE" with labels that identify sites
(the labels in "SITE" need not be numeric).
SITE AGE SEX_M 0 SITE_A 76.5 1 1 SITE_B 80.1 1 2 SITE_A 82.9 0 ... ... ... ... 9 SITE_B 82.1 0
The dimensionality of this dataframe must be: N_samples x N_Covariates
The order of samples must be identical in the covariate_matrix and the data_matrix.
After preparing both inputs, you can call harmonizationLearn
to harmonize
the provided dataset.
Example usage:
>>> from neuroHarmonize import harmonizationLearn >>> import pandas as pd >>> import numpy as np >>> # load your data and all numeric covariates >>> my_data = pd.read_csv('brain_volumes.csv') >>> my_data = np.array(my_data) >>> covars = pd.read_csv('subject_info.csv') >>> # run harmonization and store the adjusted data >>> my_model, my_data_adj = harmonizationLearn(my_data, covars)
The dimensionality of the matrix my_data_adj
will be identical to
my_data
: N_samples x N_features
To work with NIFTI images, you compute a mask using a pandas.DataFrame
which
contains file paths for all of the images in the training set.
>>> import pandas as pd >>> import numpy as np >>> from neuroHarmonize.harmonizationNIFTI import createMaskNIFTI >>> nifti_list = pd.read_csv('brain_images_paths.csv') >>> nifti_avg, nifti_mask, affine, hdr0 = createMaskNIFTI(nifti_list, threshold=0)
After the mask is created, you can flatten the images to a 2D numpy.array
very similar to what is done with the tabular data example above.
>>> from neuroHarmonize.harmonizationNIFTI import flattenNIFTIs >>> nifti_array = flattenNIFTIs(nifti_list, 'thresholded_mask.nii.gz')
The next step is identical to working with tabular data. You simply pass the 2D
array to neuroHarmonize.harmonizationLearn
.
>>> import neuroHarmonize as nh >>> covars = pd.read_csv('subject_info.csv') >>> my_model, nifti_array_adj = nh.harmonizationLearn(nifti_array, covars) >>> nh.saveHarmonizationModel(my_model, 'MY_MODEL')
Lastly, you can apply the model sequentially to images in a larger dataset with
applyModelNIFTIs
. When performing NIFTI harmonization, loading the entire set
of images may exceed memory capacity. This function will reduce the burden on
memory by applying the model to images one-by-one and saving the results as NIFTIs.
>>> from neuroHarmonize.harmonizationNIFTI import applyModelNIFTIs >>> # load pre-trained model >>> my_model = nh.loadHarmonizationModel('MY_MODEL') >>> applyModelNIFTIs(covars, my_model, nifti_list, 'thresholded_mask.nii.gz')
This feature allows you to train a harmonization model on a subset of data, then apply the model to the entire set. For example, in longitudinal analyses, one may wish to train a harmonization model on baseline cases and apply the model to follow-up cases, to avoid double-counting subjects.
If you have previously trained a harmonization model with harmonizationLearn
,
you may apply the model parameters to new data with harmonizationApply
.
First load the model:
>>> from neuroHarmonize import harmonizationApply, loadHarmonizationModel >>> import pandas as pd >>> import numpy as np >>> # load a pre-trained model >>> my_model = loadHarmonizationModel('../models/my_model')
Next, prepare the holdout data on which you will apply the model. This data
must look exactly like the training data for harmonizationLearn
, including
the same number and order of covariates. If the holdout data contains a
different number of sites, an error will be thrown.
After preparing the holdout data simply apply the model:
>>> df_holdout = pd.read_csv('../data/brain_volumes_holdout.csv') >>> my_holdout_data = np.array(df_holdout) >>> covars = pd.read_csv('subject_info_holdout.csv') >>> my_holdout_data_adj = harmonizationApply(my_holdout_data, covars, my_model)
You may specify nonlinear covariate effects with the optional argument:
smooth_terms
. For example, you may want to specify age as a nonlinear
term in the harmonization model, if age exhibits nonlinear relationships with
brain volumes. This can be done easily with harmonizationLearn
:
>>> from neuroHarmonize import harmonizationLearn >>> import pandas as pd >>> import numpy as np >>> # load your data and all numeric covariates >>> my_data = pd.read_csv('brain_volumes.csv') >>> my_data = np.array(my_data) >>> covars = pd.read_csv('subject_info.csv') >>> # run harmonization with NONLINEAR effects of age >>> my_model, my_data_adj = harmonizationLearn(data, covars, smooth_terms=['AGE'])
When applying nonlinear models to holdout data, you may get an error: "some data
points fall outside the outermost knots, and I'm not sure how to handle them".
This is documented: statsmodels/statsmodels#2361.
The current workaround is to use the optional argument: smooth_term_bounds
,
which controls the boundary knots for nonlinear estimation. You should specify
boundaries that contain the limits of the entire dataset, including holdout data.
Note the default behavior is to run the empirical Bayes (EB) step of ComBat, which is useful for harmonizing multiple features that are similar such as genes or brain regional volumes.
To run without EB, simply pass the optional argument eb=False
to
harmonizationLearn
. This is convenient when harmonizing a small number of
features, e.g. fewer than 10.
When eb=True
, ComBat uses Empirical Bayes to fit a prior distribution for
the site effects for each site. You may wish to visualize fit of the prior
distribution, along with the observed distribution of site effects. The following
code example plots both distributions for the location effect of site 1.
>>> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt >>> import seaborn as sns >>> from neuroHarmonize import loadHarmonizationModel >>> model = loadHarmonizationModel('../models/my_model') >>> site_01 = stats.norm.rvs(size=10000, loc=model['gamma_bar'][0], scale=np.sqrt(model['t2'][0])) >>> sns.kdeplot(site_01, color='blue', label='Site-1-prior') >>> sns.kdeplot(model['gamma_hat'][0, :], color='blue', label='Site-1-observed', linestyle='--') >>> plt.show()
[1] | Pomponio, R., Shou, H., Davatzikos, C., et al., (2019). "Harmonization of large MRI datasets for the analysis of brain imaging patterns throughout the lifespan." Neuroimage 208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116450. |
[2] | Fortin, J. P., N. Cullen, Y. I. Sheline, W. D. Taylor, I. Aselcioglu, P. A. Cook, P. Adams, C. Cooper, M. Fava, P. J. McGrath, M. McInnis, M. L. Phillips, M. H. Trivedi, M. M. Weissman and R. T. Shinohara (2017). "Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites." Neuroimage 167: 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.024. |
[3] | (1, 2) W. Evan Johnson and Cheng Li, Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics, 8(1):118-127, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037. |