Add CronJob and StatefulSet targetting when copy_target is enabled.

[meowjesty]

• Issue: #404 and #543

1. Adds CronJob as a possible target (requires copy_target feature to be enabled);
2. Adds StatefulSet as a possible target (requires copy_target feature to be enabled);

[Razz4780]

There's also one thing I missed when reviewing previous JobTarget PR - we need a feature flag in the operator status to check whether this target type is supported

[Razz4780]

• Issue: #404

Issue not found ;/

[aviramha]

There's also one thing I missed when reviewing previous JobTarget PR - we need a feature flag in the operator status to check whether this target type is supported

We could trust the mirrord ls in terms of UX, no?

[Razz4780]

There's also one thing I missed when reviewing previous JobTarget PR - we need a feature flag in the operator status to check whether this target type is supported

We could trust the mirrord ls in terms of UX, no?

Yes, job targets should not be listed unless operator supports them

[aviramha]

There's also one thing I missed when reviewing previous JobTarget PR - we need a feature flag in the operator status to check whether this target type is supported

We could trust the mirrord ls in terms of UX, no?

Yes, job targets should not be listed unless operator supports them

I'm saying we don't need a feature flag because it either returns it as an option or it doesn't.

[aviramha]

If we want a feature flag for nicer error, I'd make a "target not supported" error with appropriate message and re-use it, as we're adding more and more targets, and it's a bit weird to have a feature flag for each

[Razz4780]

If we want a feature flag for nicer error, I'd make a "target not supported" error with appropriate message and re-use it, as we're adding more and more targets, and it's a bit weird to have a feature flag for each

Okok, makes sense