Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check benefits of winget vs chocolatey #62

Closed
CAMOBAP opened this issue Oct 10, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Check benefits of winget vs chocolatey #62

CAMOBAP opened this issue Oct 10, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@CAMOBAP
Copy link
Contributor

CAMOBAP commented Oct 10, 2021

https://github.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs

cc @ronaldtse

@CAMOBAP CAMOBAP self-assigned this Oct 10, 2021
@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

ronaldtse commented Oct 10, 2021

Thanks — didn’t know about winget. Let’s make a winget package in a new repo. Can you help start that?

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

So it has to be an installation package.

At this time installers must either be MSIX, MSI or .exe application installers. Standalone or portable executables, compressed .zip files, and fonts are not currently supported.

@CAMOBAP
Copy link
Contributor Author

CAMOBAP commented Oct 10, 2021

@ronaldtse good point, I didn't checked it further, looks like not applicable for us

@CAMOBAP CAMOBAP closed this as completed Oct 10, 2021
@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

@CAMOBAP we can wrap metanorma in an installation package using MSIX (https://github.com/microsoft/msix-packaging), which also allows us to code sign the package.

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

Let's continue over at metanorma/packed-mn#159

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants