Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Optional indexing #31

Closed
mgalloy opened this issue Oct 22, 2012 · 3 comments
Closed

Optional indexing #31

mgalloy opened this issue Oct 22, 2012 · 3 comments
Assignees
@mgalloy
Labels
enhancement [output]
Milestone
IDLdoc 3.2

Comments

@mgalloy
Copy link
Owner

mgalloy commented Oct 22, 2012

It would be very useful if indexing was only performed on files, classes, and routines. For large code bases including parameters, fields, and keywords can make the index too large to be usable.
@ghost ghost assigned mgalloy Oct 22, 2012
@mgalloy mgalloy closed this as completed Oct 22, 2012
@mgalloy
Copy link
Owner Author

mgalloy commented Oct 22, 2012

Yes, maybe there should be an INDEX_LEVEL keyword to IDLDOC:

|| INDEX_LEVEL || Description ||
|| 0 || do not produce an index ||
|| 1 || index directories, files, classes, and routines ||
|| 2 || index level 1 items plus parameters, keywords, and fields ||

@mgalloy
Copy link
Owner Author

mgalloy commented Oct 22, 2012

Author: jhood
That would be great if you can fit it in! Thanks.

@mgalloy
Copy link
Owner Author

mgalloy commented Oct 22, 2012

Changes are in r543.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mgalloy mgalloy

Labels
enhancement [output]
Projects
None yet
Milestone
IDLdoc 3.2
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mgalloy