Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to Github Actions #103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2023
Merged

Switch to Github Actions #103

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2023

Conversation

mgerst
Copy link
Owner

@mgerst mgerst commented Dec 4, 2021

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 90.59% and project coverage change: +2.14 🎉

Comparison is base (6161c3f) 77.36% compared to head (2e334e2) 79.51%.

❗ Current head 2e334e2 differs from pull request most recent head 60995c0. Consider uploading reports for the commit 60995c0 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #103      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.36%   79.51%   +2.14%     
==========================================
  Files          27       29       +2     
  Lines        1551     1718     +167     
==========================================
+ Hits         1200     1366     +166     
- Misses        351      352       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
flag_slurper/autolib/protocols.py 31.81% <15.38%> (-2.21%) ⬇️
flag_slurper/autolib/exploit.py 58.06% <100.00%> (+11.82%) ⬆️
flag_slurper/autolib/models.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
flag_slurper/autolib/post.py 95.20% <100.00%> (+0.94%) ⬆️
flag_slurper/cli.py 97.91% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
flag_slurper/conf/config.py 98.70% <100.00%> (-1.30%) ⬇️
flag_slurper/shadow/cmd.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
flag_slurper/shadow/formatters.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 13 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@mgerst mgerst force-pushed the feature/swith-to-github-actions branch from 11ffb0a to 60995c0 Compare April 22, 2023 03:44
@mgerst mgerst marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2023 03:45
@mgerst mgerst merged commit 828a313 into master Apr 22, 2023
@mgerst mgerst deleted the feature/swith-to-github-actions branch April 22, 2023 03:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant