Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump rspec-rails from 4.0.2 to 5.0.1 #388

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2021

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 18, 2021

Bumps rspec-rails from 4.0.2 to 5.0.1.

Changelog

Sourced from rspec-rails's changelog.

5.0.1 / 2021-03-18

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Limit multibyte example descriptions when used in system tests for #method_name which ends up as screenshot names etc. (@​y-yagi, #2405, #2487)

5.0.0 / 2021-03-09

Full Changelog

Enhancements:

  • Support new #file_fixture_path and new fixture test support code. (Jon Rowe, #2398)
  • Support for Rails 6.1. (Benoit Tigeot, Jon Rowe, Phil Pirozhkov, and more #2398)

Breaking Changes:

  • Drop support for Rails below 5.2.

4.1.1 / 2021-03-09

Bug Fixes:

  • Remove generated specs when destroying a generated controller. (@​Naokimi, #2475)

4.1.0 / 2021-03-06

Enhancements:

  • Issue a warning when using job matchers with #at mis-match on usec precision. (Jon Rowe, #2350)
  • Generated request specs now have a bare _spec suffix instead of request_spec. (Eloy Espinaco, Luka Lüdicke, #2355, #2356, #2378)
  • Generated scaffold now includes engine route helpers when inside a mountable engine. (Andrew W. Lee, #2372)
  • Improve request spec "controller" scafold when no action is specified. (Thomas Hareau, #2399)
  • Introduce testing snippets concept (Phil Pirozhkov, Benoit Tigeot, #2423)
  • Prevent collisions with let(:name) for Rails 6.1 and let(:method_name) on older Rails. (Benoit Tigeot, #2461)
Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [rspec-rails](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails) from 4.0.2 to 5.0.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/blob/main/Changelog.md)
- [Commits](rspec/rspec-rails@v4.0.2...v5.0.1)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.813% when pulling c78c45b on dependabot/bundler/rspec-rails-5.0.1 into a6d6db4 on main.

@michaelabon michaelabon merged commit 3826fb0 into main Mar 30, 2021
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/bundler/rspec-rails-5.0.1 branch March 30, 2021 01:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants