Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

<charconv>: Fix from_chars for floating-point types #3670

Merged

Conversation

frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

This PR

  • changes the calculation of the exponent part, and
  • handles non-zero tail digits in the integral part even there's no decimal point.

Fixes #1792. Fixes #3161.

- handle non-zero tail digits in the integral part
- change the calculation of the exponent part
@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja requested a review from a team as a code owner April 25, 2023 01:26
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 25, 2023
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej self-assigned this Apr 26, 2023
stl/inc/charconv Show resolved Hide resolved
stl/inc/charconv Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

Thank you! 😻 😻 😻 These changes are exceptionally clean and I pushed only the tiniest of nitpicks.

@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej removed their assignment Apr 27, 2023
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej self-assigned this Apr 27, 2023
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

I'm speculatively mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed.

Copy link
Contributor

@strega-nil-ms strega-nil-ms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor change that would be nice for readability, but isn't necessary.

// Adjust _Exponent and _Exponent_adjustment when they have different signedness to avoid overflow.
if (_Exponent > 0 && _Exponent_adjustment < 0) {
if (_Is_hexadecimal) {
const ptrdiff_t _Further_adjustment = (_STD max)(-((_Exponent - 1) / 4 + 1), _Exponent_adjustment);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not worth resetting testing, but it'd be nice in these "_Further_adjustment is negative" cases, to instead negate the other term and use (_STD min); this would imo, make it much clearer what's happening, and you won't be adding and subtracting a negative number.

@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej merged commit 091cad2 into microsoft:main Apr 28, 2023
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

Thanks again so much for investigating and fixing these bugs in my favorite header! 😻 🎉 🚀

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the from_chars-fp-overhaul branch April 29, 2023 05:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
3 participants