Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix bug #3 and add corresponding test case #4

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 18, 2016
Merged

Fix bug #3 and add corresponding test case #4

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 18, 2016

Commits on Aug 12, 2016

  1. Fix bug #3 and add corresponding test case

    @blumu
    blumu committed Aug 12, 2016
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    49e4dba View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Aug 16, 2016

  1. More unit test to cover ambiguity with fields named 'Some'

    @blumu
    blumu committed Aug 16, 2016
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    00f5703 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Aug 18, 2016

  1. Force boxing for type Option<'a> if the structure of type 'a may … 

    …lead to ambiguities. (Better and more complete fix for #3)

This ambiguity occurs for instance for discriminated union or record types that happen to have a field named 'Some'
    @blumu
    blumu committed Aug 18, 2016
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    187e9d1 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history