Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

False errors about Parenthesis ( ) characters in x500 Addresses #16

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
HelenTreasure opened this issue May 15, 2020 · 5 comments · Fixed by #26
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

False errors about Parenthesis ( ) characters in x500 Addresses #16

HelenTreasure opened this issue May 15, 2020 · 5 comments · Fixed by #26
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working fixed / complete For items that are addressed and awaiting release
Milestone

Comments

@HelenTreasure
Copy link

Category

  • Enhancement
  • Bug
  • Question
  • Documentation gap/issue

Version

Please specify what version of IdFix you are using: [2.2.0.0]

Expected Behavior

x500 addresses are not flagged up as invalid proxy addresses
We previously used version 1.11 and that version has the expected behaviour.

Observed Behavior

x500 addresses are flagged up as invalid proxy addresses with a Character error, causing thousands of false errors.
The suggested correction by the tool is to remove Parenthesis "(" and ")" characters.
This is incorrect and sync is unaffected. Our valid x500 addresses contain these characters and are simply repopulated from Azure during the next sync if the address is changed or removed.

Steps to Reproduce

Add an x500 proxy address to an AD object that contains the characters Parenthesis "(" or ")", such as the following:
x500:/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=f7a6b595bd894d3ca3d5f1cfae62d4fb-FirstLastna
Run a query in IDFix and review the results.

image

@pedro-roeseler
Copy link

Having the same problem in two of my clients.

@jwilkes260 jwilkes260 self-assigned this May 15, 2020
@patrick-rodgers patrick-rodgers added this to the 2.2.0.1 milestone May 17, 2020
patrick-rodgers pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 18, 2020
@patrick-rodgers
Copy link
Member

Thanks for letting us know - we have a proposed fix in and just need to do some further testing before we make the next release.

@patrick-rodgers patrick-rodgers added bug Something isn't working fixed / complete For items that are addressed and awaiting release labels May 18, 2020
@246fname
Copy link

Any update for when 2.2.0.1 or newer version will be published?

Thanks.

@danvailcolorado
Copy link

I am having the same exact same issues with 2.2.0.0. I am currently using Azure AD Connect to upload a subset of users into Azure and was cleaning up problems reported by a previous version of IDFix. I was down to just a handful of issues and then noticed I was using an older version of IDFix. I upgraded to 2.2.0.0 and then reran it and it added over 150 additional accounts in for needing charcter edit(needing to removing Parentheses from the x500 addreses). I was not paying attention to the subset of users and made a couple of the edits in IDFix, but then noticed that something was fighting me and changing the attribute in AD back. I did it again and confirmed the attributes in AD had a parenthesis in x500 address, confired that IDFix edit removed that parenthesis in AD attributes, and then confirmed that Azure AD Connect was syncing and re-adding the parenthesis back to the value that causes IDFix to report as a problem. The Service Sync Manager on Azure AD Connect is not reporting any issues. My version of Azure AD Connect is 1.4 and a few months old, so I am going to update it to 1.5, but assuming this is a bug with IDFix 2.2.0.0

@patrick-rodgers
Copy link
Member

Just released 2.3.0.0 including a fix for this issue. Please try out the latest version and you should no longer see this issue. Thank you for your patience and for reporting the issue allowing us to get it fixed. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working fixed / complete For items that are addressed and awaiting release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants