-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for --Installer-Type
argument for commands
#3516
Changes from all commits
3ca8814
51e1b61
a40a6ef
e2bbad8
a155cc1
12b467f
da47fb5
5ed23fc
3bbad1e
08cfe54
b95a65c
7d64507
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -93,6 +93,28 @@ | |
"minItems": 1, | ||
"maxItems": 4 | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"installerTypes": { | ||
"description": "The installerType(s) to use for a package install", | ||
"type": "array", | ||
"items": { | ||
"uniqueItems": "true", | ||
"type": "string", | ||
"enum": [ | ||
"inno", | ||
"wix", | ||
"msi", | ||
"nullsoft", | ||
"zip", | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is zip an installer type users would care about? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think it will be a common scenario, but it should still be supported if people prefer that installer type. |
||
"msix", | ||
"exe", | ||
"burn", | ||
Comment on lines
+104
to
+111
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Would a user really care about whether something is an msi or an msi made with some-tool? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Would this essentially mean that we would need an "InstallerTechnologyType" for each Installer? Effectively reducing it to portable, exe, msi, msix, and msstore? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, that's what I'm suggesting. But I don't know if it would be a good idea. I don't think most people would care about the difference between a wix and an msi installer, but for people who do care I think it would be confusing if the set of types here is different than in the manifest. |
||
"msstore", | ||
"portable" | ||
], | ||
"minItems": 1, | ||
"maxItems": 9 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nit: I don't see much point in having There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. All of the other settings arrays declare a maxItems so I followed it just to be consistent. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It's weird but ok, Anyway this settings schema is not used in code for enforcement, it's just informational only for now. |
||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How does this work for scenarios like "zip containing exe" or "exe that installs an msi"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Zip uses the EffectiveInstallerType, but that brings up a good point - if someone has
{zip, exe}
as their preferences, because the check is against both base and effective type, a zip->msi could still be chosen even if a zip->exe existsAnd another great point about the exe that installs an msi or msix; AppsAndFeaturesEntries->InstallerType might need to be considered
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For zip containing exe, I check both the baseInstallerType (for zip) and effective installer type to determine if an installer satisfies the preference/requirement so I believe that scenario is covered. I didn't do anything different for "exe that installs an msi" as I only consider what is shown in the manifest