Rename this project

[radare]

i'm the only r2 in this place

[NeiPCs]

I prefer request2 instead of r2.
It also direct refer to request library, which this one suppose to replace.

[ljharb]

r2 is a well-known LTR CSS converter https://github.com/ded/R2, fwiw

[devellopah]

maybe rqst?

[chrishaff]

fetchquest

[jeasonstudio]

How about req2

[qaisjp]

How about potato

[thechriswalker]

@qaisjp unfortunately potato is taken on npm... :( otherwise you'd have my vote...
https://www.npmjs.com/package/potato

[aganglada]

refetch

[qaisjp]

What about `pota2o`

…

On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, 1:09 pm Alejandro Garcia Anglada < ***@***.***> wrote: refetch — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA4WamtgYMKTZI6movNAM46s6BMZyHiaks5sfSvbgaJpZM4PKKmh> .

[fega]

r2q2 ¿?

[JamesMGreene]

refetch

Already taken. 😞

[JamesMGreene]

How about req2

Already taken.

[JamesMGreene]

I prefer request2 instead of r2.

And request2 is already taken as well.

[JamesMGreene]

maybe rqst?

Already taken.

[JamesMGreene]

So, of all the suggestions here, the only ones currently available on NPM are:

• fetchquest
• r2q2

I'll also throw in a few other available ones:

• reqfetch
• fetchreq

[yoavmmn]

what about rq2? it's available on NPM

[refack]

radquest
(rad is always rad, but also loosely based on http://www.dictionary.com/browse/red-)

[JamesMGreene]

Also: restquest

[gruhn]

or maybe roquest

ro seems to mean two in Javanese, which is kind of cool I think, since it's a JavaScript libary

[crock]

Keep the name the same, r2 is fine.

[shimondoodkin]

I prefer request2.
My ideas:
mikerequest
richrequest
requester
request-tool

[yoavmmn]

The problem is that it isn’t available on NPM. @mikeal contacted the owner of the current(not active) r2 package on NPM asking for a transfer. Another problem with the name is that r2 is a well known LTR CSS converter. Look at the discussion above.

…

On 12 Sep 2017, 20:54 +0300, Alex Crocker ***@***.***>, wrote: Keep the name the same, r2 is fine. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[fega]

or r-2??

[lirantal]

for the record, this is the best thread going on right now in github 😆

[zenflow]

It seems like many people prefer "request2" (but as @JamesMGreene pointed out, that is taken)

(I also think it would be a great name, as it is descriptive and seems to refer to the original package.)

So what about "request-2"? It has all the pros of "request2" but is available on npm...

[lirantal]

what about scoped packages? this way you can choose whatever name you want and have the prestige of your own organization :-)

[shimondoodkin]

How about request3 request4 ...

…

On יום ג׳, 12 בספט׳ 2017, 23:22 Liran Tal ***@***.***> wrote: what about scoped packages? this way you can choose whatever name you want and have the prestige of your own organization :-) — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AATMYKy7MGFOZFnw1TsV7pw2ShEitZYCks5shugVgaJpZM4PKKmh> .

[JafarAkhondali]

How about re-request ? 😐
Thanks for your amazing job, But please specify the package name in readme of repo. I lost a lot of time finding package name, I'm sure other people will do same.

[ricardogarim]

request-2 seems the best. Also, how about 2quest or toquest?

[qaisjp]

What about: potatothisthingisnotbeingrenamedpleasestoppleasepleaseplease

…

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, 2:38 pm Yoav Maman ***@***.***> wrote: what about rq2? it's available on NPM — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA4WatIY9H3DuILstigwkDk8OeaWeHyqks5shoZkgaJpZM4PKKmh> .

[mattbrunetti]

This may be an instance of bikeshedding.

@mikeal If you have no interest in renaming this please say so and save everyone the energy.

Personally I think request-2 > r2 as it has some semantic significance, but really it's not of utmost importance

[qaisjp]

@mattbrunetti The author of this repository has not commented here, so it's not like he's deliberately trying to mess with all of you.

In the end, it's just a damn name..

[mattbrunetti]

@qaisjp true. I guess you could take that to mean "i don't care"

[mikeal]

Published as r2 https://www.npmjs.com/package/r2