Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 19, 2022. It is now read-only.

Added fix and test for missing ELB definition as per issue#56 #64

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

lukaszraczylo
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #56

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+3.83%) to 53.26% when pulling 424f76a on issue/56-elb-no-longer-optional into e4e41a2 on master.

@lukaszraczylo lukaszraczylo force-pushed the issue/56-elb-no-longer-optional branch from 424f76a to 05d7ab7 Compare April 8, 2015 17:36
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+3.83%) to 53.26% when pulling 05d7ab7 on issue/56-elb-no-longer-optional into e4e41a2 on master.

@lukaszraczylo lukaszraczylo force-pushed the issue/56-elb-no-longer-optional branch from 05d7ab7 to 18ef5a8 Compare April 8, 2015 17:40
@lukaszraczylo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do not merge please

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+3.83%) to 53.26% when pulling 18ef5a8 on issue/56-elb-no-longer-optional into e4e41a2 on master.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression - ELB no longer optional when it should be
4 participants