License inconsistency?

[pombredanne]

@mischasan Your readme states the code if GPL-licensed. The license is an LGPL 3. Your code has LGPL headers with no version stated.... Can you clarify which is the correct license?
Thanks!

[mischasan]

Cool: wasn't aware of the distinction, and the text I copy-pasted was missing that digit :-)

[mischasan]

So that's updated. LGPL V3 has been around since 2007? 2008? didn't realize
the fine point of the license.
Out of curiosity, are you vetting github source, or is acism you were
interested in using?

On 27 December 2015 at 01:50, Philippe Ombredanne notifications@github.com
wrote:

@mischasan https://github.com/mischasan Your readme states the code if
GPL-licensed. The license is an LGPL 3. Your code has LGPL headers with no
version stated.... Can you clarify which is the correct license?
Thanks!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#12.

[pombredanne]

@mischasan I am interested in acism and I may craft a python binding for it.

[pombredanne]

Thanks for your quick response!

[mischasan]

Cool. Let me know. I've tweaked some tiny stuff, but nothing that I
couldn't change and check in more than 30 minutes.

On 27 December 2015 at 15:29, Philippe Ombredanne notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks for your quick response!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#12 (comment)
.