Suggested amends regarding the "pdoc3" controversy

[FergusInLondon]

Apologies for the rather drab PR, but considering the discussion in issue #330 (courtesy of @saifkhichi96) I was wondering whether this would be a suitable compromise?

This aims to provide additional context to the situation regarding pydoc3 - whilst being more sensitive to the cultural significance of the symbolism involved. It aims to:

• convey the conduct of the hostile fork in a factual manner,
• still provides sign-posting to the original discussion,
• and does so without the insensitivities currently contained in the README.

Rather than typing lengthy discussion posts on the issue, I thought it may be more worthwhile if I attempted to suggest a compromise that could satisfy both parties. I hope this PR is taken in the spirit it's intended - and that's the spirit of inclusivity and sensitivity to a topic that has perhaps been distorted/conflated.

[mhils]

See #330 (comment).

[FergusInLondon]

Well that's sad, I was hoping this would've expanded on the situation whilst also being respectful.

It's quite surprising to see the cultural and religious importance explained, as well as examples of the symbolism in use in a modern context, and still be met with a refusal. The comment that you link to is also - once again - insensitive, and by suggesting that the faiths in question only belong to one region, you're erasing an entire diaspora as well as the faith of millions of converts. I suspect a look at a map of Buddhist and Hindu temples would contain many surprises.

There's some irony that the paragraph in question contains "healthy community where everyone is treated with respected" - perhaps a more accurate update would contain the obvious exceptions of those belonging to the Hindu or Buddhist faiths, or those originating from regions of South Asia.

I think I'll leave it there, and whilst I can't say I have any respect for the decision (or understanding behind it), I understand it's your prerogative. I'll remain hopeful that discussions amongst the other maintainers will lead to a more inclusive and respectful path.

[mhils]

@FergusInLondon: I'm sorry to hear that you feel my comment is insensitive. My point in closing this PR (and now locking it) is not to reject your changes right away, but to let emotions cool down and then discuss possible changes both internally and with folks who are impartial.