Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rotary dial control via touchscreen is wrong #7159

Open
mixxxbot opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

rotary dial control via touchscreen is wrong #7159

mixxxbot opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@mixxxbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Reported by: daschuer
Date: 2013-08-28T07:28:39Z
Status: Confirmed
Importance: Low
Launchpad Issue: lp1217738
Tags: gui, skin, touchscreen


Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).

This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)

This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #⁠1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.

However, I'd like it if this were not considered a child of Bug #⁠1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably preemptively fix a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreen will work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to work with any program).

It would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: dominated. Onward to multitouch.

@mixxxbot mixxxbot transferred this issue from another repository Aug 24, 2022
@ronso0 ronso0 added skins and removed skin labels Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants