Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sorry - not an issue. Question. What should I consider when..... #15

Open
Snarfer opened this issue Jun 12, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Sorry - not an issue. Question. What should I consider when..... #15

Snarfer opened this issue Jun 12, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@Snarfer
Copy link

Snarfer commented Jun 12, 2015

Thinking about building this out with a 300mm square bed, bowden extruder, maybe 400mm high? Would like to hear your thoughts on potential difficulties we might encounter on stretching this out. Using Marlin firmware. A Bowden recommendation would be appreciated. I have always appreciated your thoughtful innovations to the Prusa - my son and I built an i3 about 3 years ago. What head are you using? We are considering an E3D over our original JHead.

Nice work, btw - hope your kits sell well! I might consider buying one if I could select some mods ;)

Cheers!

@mjrice
Copy link
Owner

mjrice commented Jun 12, 2015

I think that if you stretch the X axis that much, you may have more deflection in the X axis rods than you'd like. The Y axis doesn't experience that much since the bearings are much farther apart (and it doesn't have the weight of the extuder cantilevered out like the X axis does).

As for the Z axis to 400mm, I think you'll be ok as long as you use the angled side braces and mount the machine to a wooden deck. That will make the upright frame stiff enough that the extra height shouldn't be a problem.

I am using both the original JHeads and the e3d-lite6. I like them both. Hope that helps!

@Snarfer
Copy link
Author

Snarfer commented Jun 13, 2015

Great point on the x-axis. How about a 3rd rail on the x-axis? I
thought first to just make the two thicker - but the momentum around the
current rods would make sourcing them easier. Tweak the carriage for the
hot end to add a third rail so you could stretch it out to 400, 500?
Haha! Stiffen up that expansion and your off and running!

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Martin Rice notifications@github.com
wrote:

I think that if you stretch the X axis that much, you may have more
deflection in the X axis rods than you'd like. The Y axis doesn't
experience that much since the bearings are much farther apart (and it
doesn't have the weight of the extuder cantilevered out like the X axis
does).

As for the Z axis to 400mm, I think you'll be ok as long as you use the
angled side braces and mount the machine to a wooden deck. That will make
the upright frame stiff enough that the extra height shouldn't be a problem.

I am using both the original JHeads and the e3d-lite6. I like them both.
Hope that helps!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#15 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants