Fix submission checker for GPTJ for datacenter+edge

[nvzhihanj]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅

[nvzhihanj]

@pgmpablo157321 @mrasquinha-g @arjunsuresh can you reivew this?

[nv-ananjappa]

@mrasquinha-g @mrmhodak Could you review and merge ASAP? It is quite an uncontroversial and small diff.

[arjunsuresh]

Like bert-99.9, gptj-99.9 is datacenter only right?

[nvzhihanj]

Like bert-99.9, gptj-99.9 is datacenter only right?

@arjunsuresh I think in the LLM WG, we approved GPTJ edge submission for both 99 and 99.9 accuracy threshold.

[arjunsuresh]

@nvzhihanj IIRC gptj-99.9 was decided as datacenter only similar to bert-99.9. But if this is not the case, this change must be done in the edge category section also.

[nvzhihanj]

@arjunsuresh we can discuss this in tomorrow's meeting. For now, I will add them to the optional scenarios. Does that make sense?

[arjunsuresh]

@nvzhihanj I'm not sure about optional scenarios. @pgmpablo157321 what would you suggest?

[nvzhihanj]

Added to required for now.