-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create test coverage reports by default in pytest #5669
Conversation
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thanks @harupy, great idea!
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
[pytest] | |||
addopts = --color=yes --durations=5 --showlocals --verbose | |||
addopts = --cov=./mlflow --cov-report html --color=yes --durations=5 --showlocals --verbose |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heads up @harupy this line seems to be preventing breakpoints in PyCharm from working when debugging a test:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/40906766/13837474
Not too much of a problem because I can just temporarily remove these arguments when iterating. But do we have bandwidth to fix this?
cc @dbczumar
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually it seems you can do this by default for all pytest configurations: https://stackoverflow.com/a/52295919/13837474
So this shouldn't be a problem. Never mind :)
Signed-off-by: harupy 17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Create test coverage reports by default in pytest:
The reports are created in
htmlcov
and can be view on the broswer.Motivation
To make it easier to find lines that are not covered by tests.
How is this patch tested?
Manually
Does this PR change the documentation?
ci/circleci: build_doc
check. If it's successful, proceed to thenext step, otherwise fix it.
Details
on the right to open the job page of CircleCI.Artifacts
tab.docs/build/html/index.html
.Release Notes
Is this a user-facing change?
(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)
What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/artifacts
: Artifact stores and artifact loggingarea/build
: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs
: MLflow documentation pagesarea/examples
: Example codearea/model-registry
: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/models
: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/projects
: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/scoring
: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/server-infra
: MLflow Tracking server backendarea/tracking
: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingInterface
area/uiux
: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/docker
: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Modelsarea/sqlalchemy
: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registryarea/windows
: Windows supportLanguage
language/r
: R APIs and clientslanguage/java
: Java APIs and clientslanguage/new
: Proposals for new client languagesIntegrations
integrations/azure
: Azure and Azure ML integrationsintegrations/sagemaker
: SageMaker integrationsintegrations/databricks
: Databricks integrationsHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/breaking-change
- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/none
- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/feature
- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix
- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation
- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes