-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix log_artifact for large model in HDFS #5812
Conversation
@hitchhicker Thanks for the contribution! The DCO check failed. Please sign off your commits by following the instructions here: https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/runs/6266347573. See https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#sign-your-work for more details. |
@@ -33,8 +33,7 @@ def log_artifact(self, local_file, artifact_path=None): | |||
with hdfs_system(scheme=self.scheme, host=self.host, port=self.port) as hdfs: | |||
_, file_name = os.path.split(local_file) | |||
destination = posixpath.join(hdfs_base_path, file_name) | |||
with hdfs.open(destination, "wb") as output: | |||
output.write(open(local_file, "rb").read()) | |||
hdfs.upload(destination, open(local_file, "rb")) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Can we use open()
as a context manager to make sure that the file is closed after read? Can we also make that change to the other line below?
hdfs.upload(destination, open(local_file, "rb")) | |
with open(local_file, "rb") as f: | |
hdfs.upload(destination, f) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for you review. Very good advice ! I just added it.
I think the last failure might be due to the fact that it is not closed correctly. I don't have such failure when I run the unit tests on Linux though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome! Looks like that addressed it :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hitchhicker Thanks so much for filing this PR! It looks great! Just left a very tiny suggestion & am happy to merge once it's addressed. I've confirmed that the HDFS upload API is available in older pyarrow versions (e.g. 1.0 - https://arrow.apache.org/docs/1.0/python/generated/pyarrow.HadoopFileSystem.upload.html), so it should be safe to make this change.
…reater than 2GB (mlflow#4025) Signed-off-by: Bokai YU <b.yu@criteo.com>
Signed-off-by: Bokai YU <b.yu@criteo.com>
Use
HadoopFileSystem
upload API can address the problem of log_artifact when the model is larger than 2GB.What changes are proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
How is this patch tested?
(Details)
Does this PR change the documentation?
ci/circleci: build_doc
check. If it's successful, proceed to thenext step, otherwise fix it.
Details
on the right to open the job page of CircleCI.Artifacts
tab.docs/build/html/index.html
.Release Notes
Is this a user-facing change?
(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)
What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/artifacts
: Artifact stores and artifact loggingarea/build
: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs
: MLflow documentation pagesarea/examples
: Example codearea/model-registry
: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/models
: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/projects
: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/scoring
: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFsarea/server-infra
: MLflow Tracking server backendarea/tracking
: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingInterface
area/uiux
: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev serverarea/docker
: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Modelsarea/sqlalchemy
: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registryarea/windows
: Windows supportLanguage
language/r
: R APIs and clientslanguage/java
: Java APIs and clientslanguage/new
: Proposals for new client languagesIntegrations
integrations/azure
: Azure and Azure ML integrationsintegrations/sagemaker
: SageMaker integrationsintegrations/databricks
: Databricks integrationsHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/breaking-change
- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/none
- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/feature
- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix
- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation
- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes