-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 882
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use direct server return in east-west overlay load balancing #2270
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
better DisableARPForIfc?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hrmm.. Don't object to renaming, but the suggestion is less accurate. The function doesn't disable ARP for all addresses. It just disables it for addresses assigned to a different interface. We really only care that the VIP addresses have ARP suppressed for purposes of this API. But the operation does change behavior slightly. Say you had:
The way containers are currently configured, if you ARPed 10.2.0.7 on eth0, you'd get a response back indicating that that address was on that interface. The ARP configurations that this function performs would prevent that. (the contaienr would ignore incoming ARPs for 10.2.0.7 on eth0) Ideally, we would be configuring this behavior ONLY for the VIP addresses (which get assigned to
lo
). Unfortunately, there isn't a nice way to do that without using arptables as far as I know. And requiring arptables and the like on docker installations is not feasible.As far as ARPing across interfaces goes, my personal opinion is that this behavior should be the restriction that this function puts in place should be the default. But the Linux devs disagree. In any case I don't think that the more relaxed behavior is something an application developer should rely on. (see https://lwn.net/Articles/45373/) So the restriction should be ok. It would also be a property of the network, in any case. (i.e. only applies to endpoints that are on a "dsr"-option-enabled "overlay" network).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see the point, it's difficult to express with a concise name. nvm for the moment then